RESUMEN
Objectives: There is a paucity of data on echocardiographic findings in patients with COVID-19 supported with Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO). This study aimed to compare baseline echocardiographic characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 infection with and without VV ECMO support and to describe the incidence of new echocardiographic abnormalities in these patients. Method(s): Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients admitted from March 2020 to June 2021 with COVID-19 infection, that required mechanical ventilation, and had an available echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission. Follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay were reviewed. Result(s): A total of 242 patients were included in the study. One-hundred and forty-five (60%) patients were supported with VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO2/ FiO2 was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in the VV ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (P = < 0.001). On the admission echocardiograms, the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (10% vs 15%, P= 0.31) and right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (38% vs. 27%, P = 0.27) was not significantly different in the ECMO and non-ECMO groups. However, there was a higher proportion of acute cor pulmonale (41% vs. 26 %, P = 0.02) in the ECMO group. During their ICU stay, echocardiographic RV systolic function worsened in 44 (36%) patients in the ECMO group compared with six (10%) patients in the non-ECMO group (P< 0.001). The overall odds ratio for death for patients with worsening RV systolic function was 1.8 (95% confidence interval 0.95-3.37). Conclusion(s): Echocardiographic findings suggested that the presence of RV systolic dysfunction in COVIDECMO patients was comparable to the non-ECMO group on admission. However, a higher percentage of patients on ECMO developed worsening RV systolic function during follow-up.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is placing abnormally high and ongoing demands on healthcare systems. Little is known about the full effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on diseases other than COVID-19 in the South African setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe a cohort of hospitalised patients under investigation for SARS-CoV-2 that initially tested negative. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalised at Khayelitsha Hospital from April to June 2020, whose initial polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 was negative were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision) diagnosis, referral to tertiary level facilities and ICU, and all-cause in-hospital mortality were collected. The 90-day re-test rate was determined and comparisons were made using the χ2-test and the independent samples median test. RESULTS: Overall, 261 patients were included: median age 39.8 years, 55.6% female (n = 145). Frequent comorbidities included HIV (41.4%), hypertension (26.4%), and previous or current tuberculosis (24.1%). Nine (3.7%) patients were admitted to ICU and 38 (15.6%) patients died. Ninety-three patients (35.6%) were re-tested and 21 (22.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. The top primary diagnoses related to respiratory diseases (n = 82, 33.6%), and infectious and parasitic diseases (n = 62, 25.4%). Thirty-five (14.3%) had a COVID-19 diagnostic code assigned (26 without microbiological confirmation) and 43 (16.5%) had tuberculosis. Older age (p = 0.001), chronic renal impairment (p = 0.03) and referral to higher level of care (all p < 0.001; ICU p = 0.03) were more frequent in those that died. CONCLUSION: Patients with tuberculosis and other diseases are still presenting to emergency centres with symptoms that may be attributable to SARS-CoV-2 and requiring admission. Extreme vigilance will be necessary to diagnosis and treat tuberculosis and other diseases as we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic.